Re-post from Maricopa County Republican Committee Briefs(MCRC Briefs) by Frosty Taylor. The Current Tentative List of 1,235 state committeemen, including nominees not yet formally elected: http://az.gop/arizona-republican-state-meeting-2017-committeemen/
The Chart Below Was Prepared By Arizona Freedom Alliance: See Proxy Harvesting - What to Expect if They GO! to read the entire article:
MCRC Statutory Meeting January 14, 2017 Stats
Red = More proxies than people. Blue – about 1/2 proxies, 1/2 peopke
| ||||||||||
Legislative District
|
Total PCs in District
|
Number of Pcs Attending In Person
|
% of Total PCs Attending in Person
|
Number of Pcs AttendingBy Proxy
|
% of Total PCs Attending by Proxy
|
Number of PCs Attending in person or by Proxy
|
% Attending in person or by Proxy
|
% of Attendees by Proxy
|
Avg no of proxies carried by person
|
No of Precincts with NO PCs
|
1
|
98
|
27
|
27.55%
|
48
|
48.98%
|
75
|
76.53%
|
64.00%
|
1.78
|
1
|
4
|
17
|
12
|
70.59%
|
1
|
5.88%
|
13
|
76.47%
|
7.69%
|
0.08
|
13
|
12
|
267
|
70
|
26.22%
|
99
|
37.08%
|
169
|
63.30%
|
58.58%
|
1.41
|
1
|
13
|
115
|
23
|
20.00%
|
52
|
45.22%
|
75
|
65.22%
|
69.33%
|
2.26
|
15
|
15
|
163
|
48
|
29.45%
|
28
|
17.18%
|
76
|
46.63%
|
36.84%
|
0.58
|
11
|
16
|
81
|
26
|
32.10%
|
16
|
19.75%
|
42
|
51.85%
|
38.10%
|
0.62
|
4
|
17
|
254
|
60
|
23.62%
|
113
|
44.49%
|
173
|
68.11%
|
65.32%
|
1.88
|
9
|
18
|
186
|
71
|
38.17%
|
59
|
31.72%
|
130
|
69.89%
|
45.38%
|
0.83
|
2
|
19
|
33
|
11
|
33.33%
|
15
|
45.45%
|
26
|
78.79%
|
57.69%
|
1.36
|
20
|
20
|
97
|
41
|
42.27%
|
20
|
20.62%
|
61
|
62.89%
|
32.79%
|
0.49
|
20
|
21
|
80
|
29
|
36.25%
|
26
|
32.50%
|
55
|
68.75%
|
47.27%
|
0.90
|
16
|
22
|
143
|
56
|
39.16%
|
28
|
19.58%
|
84
|
58.74%
|
33.33%
|
0.50
|
12
|
23
|
356
|
141
|
39.61%
|
113
|
31.74%
|
254
|
71.35%
|
44.49%
|
0.80
|
10
|
24
|
86
|
32
|
37.21%
|
19
|
22.09%
|
51
|
59.30%
|
37.25%
|
0.59
|
12
|
25
|
237
|
74
|
31.22%
|
45
|
18.99%
|
119
|
50.21%
|
37.82%
|
0.61
|
8
|
26
|
55
|
24
|
43.64%
|
16
|
29.09%
|
40
|
72.73%
|
40.00%
|
0.67
|
14
|
27
|
27
|
13
|
48.15%
|
3
|
11.11%
|
16
|
59.26%
|
18.75%
|
0.23
|
25
|
28
|
321
|
75
|
23.36%
|
139
|
43.30%
|
214
|
66.67%
|
64.95%
|
1.85
|
7
|
29
|
28
|
15
|
53.57%
|
1
|
3.57%
|
16
|
57.14%
|
6.25%
|
0.07
|
18
|
30
|
74
|
38
|
51.35%
|
27
|
36.49%
|
65
|
87.84%
|
41.54%
|
0.71
|
9
|
Total
|
2718
|
886
|
32.60%
|
868
|
31.94%
|
1754
|
64.53%
|
49.49%
|
0.98
|
227
|
CONCLUSION: At this meeting, 304 PCs present in person carried 493 proxies. This is ONLY among those seven districts that had more proxies than people in person. 189 votes were cast on behalf of ghosts in those seven districts where the predominance of votes were by proxy.... not by the actual PCs who didn't even show up. There were 868 total votes by proxies, many of them ghost proxies*. Is that right, by any measure? Remember, two candidates were elected by 54 and 45 votes. You see how proxies elected these two board members. Is that right? If YOU were there, you got only ONE vote but for those who carried proxies, some got as many as nine or ten votes but the average was 1.62 votes for those in person.
